This public example uses the same web-based layout as reports created from the AudSite account area.
This fictional studio website has a confident visual identity and a strong project portfolio. Its main opportunities are clearer service journeys, more descriptive project content, improved keyboard accessibility, faster image delivery and better privacy information around enquiries.
Each score summarises the observed signals and recommendations in that section.
The first actions to review before moving into the detailed findings.
Give every link, menu control and form field a persistent high-contrast focus style.
Serve correctly sized modern image formats and lazy-load imagery below the first screen.
Group the site around Work, Services, Process, About and Contact, with one clear enquiry action.
Document purposes, lawful bases, retention periods, providers and visitor rights in plain language.
The portfolio is visually engaging, but prospective clients must work harder than necessary to understand the studio’s services, process and next steps.
Core pages can be discovered, although metadata, internal link wording and page focus could communicate the site more clearly to search engines and visitors.
The website is usable on a typical connection, but its image-heavy pages and third-party platform resources create avoidable loading work.
Useful foundations are present, but keyboard focus, image descriptions, link naming and navigation complexity need attention. This is not a formal WCAG certification.
The tone is confident, but visitors would benefit from a clearer route from portfolio inspiration to service details, indicative budgets and starting an enquiry.
The enquiry journey needs clearer information about data handling, while third-party portfolio embeds should be documented and reviewed.